Archive

Archive for the ‘Entertainment’ Category

Review: Wrath of the Titans

April 12th, 2012 No comments

 

Almost two years after the release of Clash of the Titans, Sam Worthington is back as Perseus, the son of Zeus who struggles with his Demigod destiny, in Wrath of the Titans. What better way to review this movie than to ask a few burning questions and get answers from the one person who will give me an honest answer – ME!

What’s the plot?

The plot stays relatively simple.  Perseus teams up with Andromeda (Rosamund Pike) and Agenor (Toby Kebbell) to rescue his father Zeus (Liam Neeson) from Hades (Ralph Finnes)and his evil half demigod brother Ares (Edgar Ramirez). They also must defeat the evil Titans who’ve escaped prison and plan to destroy the world. It sounds like a lot, but it’s nothing two Demigods and a human girl can’t handle.

How is it different from 2010’s Clash?

Well, there are more monsters and en evil half brother. At times, Wrath feels a lot like Clash, but it is indeed its own story. That’s either good or bad depending on how you feel about the franchise.  Wrath also has more action, 50% less Pegasus, and 75% more Sam Worthington mullet.

What will audiences like?

They’ll enjoy some of the really cool state-of-the-art special effects.  The evil Titans look pretty good on the big screen. Toby Kebbell is great comic relief as Agenor. He’s like the third wheel comedian in a 80’s buddy cop flick. He’s annoyingly funny, but the two buddies desperately need him for [fill in expertise or something he is singular knowledge of]. Agenor fills that role in and fills it well. He’s easily my favorite part of this film.

Should I see it in 3D?

Not necessary. If you do have money to blow and like wearing plastic glasses, help yourself.

What will make people want to walk out?

The dialogue is dry and boring for the entire film. There are way too many speeches about family, brotherhood,  how they must come together as one, and blah blah blah blah. Waaaaaaay too much talking and not enough swords swinging.  The pre fight speeches were the first two times, but after the ninth time it’s pretty old. Sam Worthington is someone I want to like, but he performed like a mannequin in a tunic.  The lifeless way he delivers his lines makes me cringe. Not to mention he spend the entire movie getting his butt kicked. I don’t need my hero to be a punching bag. I know Sam is happily cashing this checks, but this has to stop.

There’s also Perseus’ son Helius. He spends the whole time looking like he’s about to cry or he’s constipated. I’m still not sure which one it was. I hated him almost as much as I hate Carl from The Walking Dead…………almost. Carl still holds the number one spot.

Also, the movie is 90 minutes, but it paced poorly so it feels much longer. I’m taking to you Unnecessary Ten Minute Scene find a maze that wasn’t even hard to solve.

Will we get to see the big battle we missed in Clash?

Nope. I’m surprised people didn’t throw drinks at the screen. 100 minutes of build up to a 2 minute fight. Audiences will not be pleased.

Was it necessary to toss in a love story at the end?

I’m not sure why that happened. I’m still trying to wash the stink of that scene off me.

How do you really feel?

If you’re a fan of Clash, you may want to buy a ticket for Wrath. If you felt Clash was just ‘meh’ and needed more work, you’re going to leave with the same frustrations after Wrath. The poor dialogue and plot points that lead nowhere were just too much for me this time around. I couldn’t’ wrap my head around seeing Zeues and Hades throw people around like rag dolls as they walk through the battlefield. That scene was sad and funny at the same time.

Wrath of the Titans is an unnecessary Clash sequel and hopefully the last.

Movie review: ‘Wrath of the Titans’ has gods and monsters, not plot and dialogue

April 12th, 2012 No comments

 

Warner Bros.
Sam Worthington as Perseus in “Wrath of the Titans” sequel.

Any chance they could release the Kraken again, just for old time’s sake?

Although 2010′s “Clash of the Titans” became a symbol of poorly converted 3-D, it had a catchphrase and advertising hook, a climatic confrontation, a sense of nostalgia because it was a remake of the 1981 original, and a simplicity about it.

Now, two years later almost to the day, sequel “Wrath of the Titans” arrives, and the 3-D is far better, but the story is uninvolving and slightly confusing, adding a new strata of locations along with demigods, fallen gods, giant cyclops and others.


‘Wrath of the Titans’


2 stars = Mediocre
Ratings explained

  • Starring: Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes.
  • Rating: PG-13 for intense sequences of fantasy violence and action.

Even the most inattentive or long-ago student might know the names Zeus, Hades and Poseidon (they named a couple of movies after him), but what about Agenor or Hephaestus?

For those who would not pick Greek mythology on “Jeopardy,” Agenor was Poseidon’s demigod son and Hephaestus was a fallen god who forged Zeus’ thunderbolt, Hades’ pitchfork and Poseidon’s trident.

“Wrath” is set a decade after half-man, half-god Perseus (Sam Worthington), the son of Zeus, defeated the beastly Kraken. Perseus’ wife is dead, and he is now living as a fisherman with his cherished 10-year-old boy, Helius.

But when Zeus (Liam Neeson) is imprisoned and in danger of having his powers and life drained away, Perseus is drawn into a series of mythic battles. Even he cannot keep the rest of the world at arm’s length, no matter how much he wants to protect his child.

Perseus confronts a three-headed Chimera, is caught in a labyrinth where the walls literally close in, battles his bitter brother Ares (Edgar Ramirez), who takes his gig as the god of war very seriously, and encounters menacing cyclops, warriors with two heads and six arms each, fireballs and Kronos, the father of Zeus, Hades and Poseidon.

In addition to Mr. Worthington and Mr. Neeson, Ralph Fiennes returns as Hades, ruler of the underworld, and Danny Huston makes another brief appearance as Poseidon. Rosamund Pike replaces “Clash” actress Alexa Davalos as Andromeda while Toby Kebbell is Agenor and Bill Nighy is Hephaestus.

“Wrath,” directed by Jonathan Liebesman (“Battle Los Angeles”), is all about fathers and sons, sons and fathers, and brothers. One key character does an about-face, from condemnation to cooperation in one easy, hard-to-buy scene.

“Wrath” was filmed in 3-D rather than converted, and that makes a huge difference. However, dialogue is sacrificed in the name of action and there’s precious little humor. Even venom is conveyed in colossal fights although Hades says to a prisoner: “You’re sweating like a human. … Next it will be tears.”

The movie needs more of that instead of yet another scene with computer-generated effects, some obvious (flying winged horse, creatures with multiple bodies and heads) and some not so obvious (gods who turn to stone and dust and disappear in seconds).

Making the ultimate enemy a fiery 1,500-foot gargantuan means the face of evil is bloodless. Even action fantasies are only as good as their villains, and this one left me cold.

Read more: http://old.post-gazette.com/pg/12090/1220392-120.stm#ixzz1rpdmAvM1

Wrath of the Titans, review

April 12th, 2012 No comments

The latest mythological action movie, Wrath of the Titans, is as clattery and joyless as its predecessor was .

Dir: Jonathan Liebesman. Starring Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Rosamund Pike, Toby Kebbell, Ralph Fiennes

‘Let’s have some fun,” growls Liam Neeson’s Zeus to Ralph Fiennes’s Hades, as the last in the series of broadly interchangeable action sequences that make up Wrath of the Titans finally grinds into action.

It’s an appealing offer, but a hollow one: the Greek god’s idea of a lark turns out to be striding across an enormous ashen plain, mirthlessly zapping six-limbed baddies with a lightning bolt. In this sequel to 2010’s equally clattery, equally joyless mythological action movie Clash of the Titans, fun is in very short supply.

At least the new film, unlike the first, does actually feature an authentic Titan. The villain of the piece is Kronos, described in Greek legend as the castrator of his father, devourer of his offspring and incestuous impregnator of his sister. However, none of these activities are allowable in a 12A certificate film, so here he is a giant 3D lava monster trapped inside a volcano.

In order to free Kronos, Hades (Fiennes) and Ares (Édgar Ramírez, utterly squandered after Carlos) lure Zeus into the underworld, where they imprison him and channel his powers into the dormant beast. Enter Zeus’s son, the demigod Perseus (Sam Worthington), who has spent the past 10 years living as a humble fisherman and raising his son Helius (John Bell).

It’s up to Perseus, the warrior princess Andromeda (Rosamund Pike, replacing Alexa Davalos) and the navigator Agenor (Toby Kebbell) to free Zeus, dispatch Kronos and thwart the conspirators, while neatly dodging any kind of character or plot development that might threaten to make the story even slightly interesting.

Along the way our heroes meet some middle-aged character actors in fake beards and dressing gowns, including Bill Nighy, who gives Hephaestus a broad Yorkshire accent, and Danny Huston, whose Poseidon calls to mind Gandalf clutching a gardening fork.

Unfortunately, Worthington is just as uncharismatic as he was in the first Titans film, but a few of the performances appeal in isolation without making any noticeable impact on the film’s overall awfulness. Rosamund Pike brings a good dollop of jolly-hockey-sticks gumption, Toby Kebbell channels Russell Brand to deliver some lines that were possibly intended as comic relief, and Lily James gives it some welly in a brief turn as Andromeda’s handmaiden Korrina; as far as I can recall, she is the only other female character to be trusted with both dialogue and a name.

Cinemagoers who have come to expect poor writing in blockbusters may not be surprised by any of this, but what really startles is the way Wrath bungles its main draw: the visuals. Director Jonathan Liebesman opts for the herky-jerky camerawork and rotor-blade editing from his last film, Battle: Los Angeles, but while bitter experience has proven that this style only works in two dimensions, Liebesman has bolted on a third in post-production regardless, which renders many of the action scenes indecipherable. Watching them, I felt as if I was sitting on top of a pneumatic drill, while a bellowing Worthington hurled handfuls of earth in my face.

Admittedly, the final brawl against Kronos is a gas, but that’s largely because it’s an almost shot-for-shot reconstruction of Perseus’s climactic battle with the Kraken in the prequel, which was that film’s only high point.

Wrath of the Titans might position itself as the successor to the equally special effects-driven Ray Harryhausen monster matinées, but it has none of those films’ febrile imagination, meticulous craftsmanship or rollicking sense of fun. Crucially, that’s ”fun’’ in the conventional sense — not the Liam Neeson Zeus sense.